For just over a hundred years, from the 1880s to the mid-1990s, the photochemical process generally referred to as ‘film’ had been used almost exclusively to capture, develop, project and store moving images, regardless of whether they were monochrome or colour, 2D or 3D, had sound or were silent. Celluloid’s monopoly was first challenged when video cameras became readily available, leading to the Dogme 95 films (or, more accurately, videos) and the festival success of such features as Chuck & Buck, Tadpole and Personal Velocity. It was not until the last years of the 20th century, however, that digital technology began to present not only a challenge to the dominance of traditional film, but a threat to its existence. It is at this tipping point that this informed and informative documentary sets out to explore the pros and cons, and asks if ‘digital’ really is a suitable successor to film.
One glance at Kenneally’s interview list will convince you that he takes his remit seriously: along with big-name directors (Boyle, Cameron, Fincher, Lucas, Lynch, Nolan, Scorsese, Soderbergh, von Trier and the Wachowskis), Keneally and Keanu Reeves, his on-screen avatar, sit down with cinematographers, technicians and executives from both sides of the debate. It’s refreshing that each is allowed to make its own case, especially given that, in these opinionated times, ‘documentary’ is often a synonym for ‘polemic’. And although there are compelling arguments on both sides, Side By Side refuses to hedge its bets. While the title suggests that the film will make a qualitative comparison, it actually refers to the current state of mostly peaceful co-existence between the two formats, a détente that cannot continue indefinitely. After all, as celluloid advocate Christopher Nolan puts it, “A transition starts with people offering a new choice, but it finishes with taking the old choice away.”
